Dorsal capsular-based vascularized distal radius graft for proximal pole scaphoid nonunion with avascular necrosis.

BACKGROUND: Scaphoid nonunion involving the proximal pole with the presence of avascular necrosis is difficult to reconstruct. We aimed to determine the efficacy of surgical treatment of proximal pole scaphoid nonunion with avascular necrosis using a dorsal capsular-based vascularized distal radius graft. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2018, 64 patients with established proximal pole scaphoid nonunion with avascular necrosis were treated using a dorsal capsular-based vascularized distal radius graft. This graft was harvested from the dorsal aspect of the distal radius with its dorsal wrist capsule attachment. Fixation of the scaphoid nonunion was performed with a small cannulated screw, followed by insertion of the vascularized graft into the dorsal trough at the scaphoid nonunion site. In the last 47 patients of this series, a micro suture anchor was placed into the scaphoid to augment graft fixation. RESULTS: Union rate was 86% (55 of 64 scaphoid nonunions with avascular necrosis) at a mean time of 12 weeks. Persistent non-union was noted in eight patients and fibrous union in one patient. No patients developed donor site morbidity. No graft dislodgment was noted. There was significant improvement of the wrist functional outcomes at the final follow up. CONCLUSIONS: The dorsal capsular-based vascularized distal radius graft is a safe and effective treatment in patients with scaphoid nonunion with avascular necrosis of the proximal pole. This pedicle vascularized bone graft is derived from a location that can easily reach the proximal third of the scaphoid avoiding microsurgical dissection or anastomosis.

Current Concepts in Compressive Neuropathies of the Upper Extremity.

The carpal and cubital tunnel syndromes are the most common compression neuropathies of the upper extremity. Although the diagnosis and management of these neuropathies have evolved over the past few decades, the ideal primary surgical treatment has not yet been established and management of recurrence remains a challenge. Revision surgery with simple repeated nerve decompression even accompanied by neurolysis does not always result in satisfactory clinical outcomes. Coverage with soft tissue or wrapping of the nerve with biologic or synthetic protective barriers can be used as an ancillary technique in the revision surgery to enhance nerve healing, preventing perineural scarring and adhesions. Future randomized larger trials combined with better understanding of nerve biology may be necessary to optimize primary and revision surgical treatment for carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome.

Scapholunate Ligament Injury: Management Strategies From Occult Injury to Arthritis.

This chapter will explore scapholunate ligament injuries with a focus on injury recognition, diagnosis, the natural history, and options for treatment. Treatment is based upon injury factors, patient factors, and surgeon preference. The classification systems in common use will be discussed, and treatment options will be explored, including nonsurgical, arthroscopic, repair, reconstruction, pain relieving measures, and salvage procedures.

Intraoperative Subluxation of the Ulnar Nerve: Use of a Triceps Sling Reconstruction Technique.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the triceps sling reconstruction technique is a safe and effective treatment of intraoperative ulnar nerve subluxation after in situ decompression. METHODS: Twelve patients who underwent a triceps sling reconstruction for intraoperative ulnar nerve subluxation after in situ release were retrospectively reviewed. The triceps sling technique consists of harvesting a small, distally based strip of triceps tendon and suturing the proximal end of the strip to the posterior aspect of the released Osborne ligament. Thus, a sling is created between the medial epicondyle and the olecranon, preventing the nerve from subluxating. Patients were clinically evaluated before and after surgery. Visual analog scale pain scores, static 2-point discrimination, strength, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score were assessed. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 31 months (range, 24-38 months), there was a significant improvement in mean visual analog pain scores from 8.6 to 0.2. Static 2-point discrimination was improved from a mean of 9.1 mm before surgery to 5.7 mm afterward. Strength improved by a mean of 33% and 30% with grip and pinch, respectively. Mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score improved from 45.9 to 3.7. No subluxation of the ulnar nerve was noted after surgery. No other complications were noted. No reoperations were required during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Triceps sling reconstruction is a safe treatment in patients with intraoperative ulnar nerve subluxation after in situ decompression. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Treatment for proximal pole scaphoid nonunion with capsular-based vascularized distal radius graft.

PURPOSE: We retrospectively reviewed the results of 89 patients with proximal pole scaphoid nonunion, 58 with avascular necrosis, treated with a capsular-based vascularized distal radius graft. METHODS: Seventy-one male and eighteen female patients with symptomatic nonunion at the proximal pole of the scaphoid were included in this study. No patient had a humpback deformity. In all patients, the vascularized bone graft was harvested from the dorsum of the distal radius and was attached to a capsular flap of the dorsal wrist capsule. After fixation of the scaphoid with a small cannulated screw, the graft was inserted press-fit into the scaphoid trough in the nonunion site. Supplementary fixation of the graft with a microsuture anchor into the scaphoid was used in 66 patients. RESULTS: At a mean time of 12.3 weeks (range 6-24) after surgery, solid union was achieved in 76 of 89 patients (49 of 58 with avascular necrosis). Eleven patients had persistent nonunion and two fibrous union as determined by CT scan. Sixty-six of the patients with solid bone union were completely pain free, and ten complained of slight pain with strenuous activities. No donor site morbidity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The capsular-based vascularized bone graft from the distal radius is a reliable alternative technique for scaphoid nonunions. It is a simple and expedient harvesting technique without the need for a microsurgical anastomoses. The supplemental fixation with a microsuture anchor eliminates the risk of graft displacement.

Revision of the Failed Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of revision surgery for failed thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroplasty. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 32 patients with failed thumb CMC arthroplasty. The primary reason for revision was pain caused by metacarpal subsidence. Revision surgery included soft tissue interposition and distraction pinning to address the metacarpal subsidence. Additional ligament reconstruction was performed in patients with thumb instability. Eight patients required additional metacarpophalangeal joint fusion for concomitant joint hyperextension. Eleven required additional partial excision of the trapezoid for concomitant scaphotrapezoidal joint arthritis. All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 57 months (range, 24-121 months). Pain levels evaluated by visual analog scale were significantly reduced in all patients after revision surgery. Mean grip strength and key pinch strength significantly increased. Twenty-seven patients achieved good functional results; those for 5 patients were fair. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that revision surgery with distraction pinning and soft tissue interposition with or without ligament reconstruction was an effective treatment for failed CMC arthroplasty of the thumb. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Cheilectomy for Treatment of Symptomatic Distal Interphalangeal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Review of 78 Patients.

PURPOSE: To determine whether open cheilectomy and debridement of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint is a safe and effective alternative to joint arthrodesis for the treatment of symptomatic osteoarthritis. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with symptomatic DIP joint osteoarthritis and with a minimum follow-up of 24 months were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative radiographs were graded. Open cheilectomy and debridement of the DIP joint was performed in all patients. The DIP joint was immobilized for 4 weeks after surgery. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically. Visual analog scale pain scores and range of motion were assessed. RESULTS: At a median final follow-up of 36 months (minimum, 24 months), there was a significant improvement in mean visual analog scale pain scores from 8 to 1. Distal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture was improved by a mean of 6° and DIP joint range of motion was improved by a mean of 20°. No postoperative infections or other complication were noted. No reoperations were required/performed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Open DIP joint cheilectomy is a safe and effective alternative to DIP joint arthrodesis in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis who wish to preserve joint motion. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome.

Cubital tunnel syndrome is the most common cause of symptomatic ulnar neuropathy. The unique anatomic course of the ulnar nerve around the elbow makes it particularly vulnerable at a location far from its terminal destination. The natural progression of cubital tunnel syndrome allows patients who have mild symptoms to be adequately treated nonsurgically. Minor changes in activity combined with appropriate splinting may acceptably alleviate symptoms. Surgical intervention is recommended for patients who have more severe symptoms. Current data confirm that in situ ulnar nerve decompression, partial medial epicondylectomy, and anterior transposition result in equal success rates; however, more invasive techniques may increase the risk for complications. If primary surgical intervention fails, revision surgery can provide good results. Modern techniques for revision surgery incorporate the placement of a protective circumferential barrier around the pathologic nerve to mitigate cicatrix formation. Although several attractive options are currently available for the management of cubital tunnel syndrome, further research is necessary to guide treatment.

Step-Cut Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: The step-cut ulnar shortening osteotomy for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome is a safe, reliable, and less expensive technique that uses a 7-hole 3.5-mm standard neutralization plate and a lag screw for fixation, thus avoiding the need for the special instrumentation that other ulnar shortening techniques require. STEP 1 PREOPERATIVE PLANNING: Perform a physical examination and obtain imaging studies to identify all associated abnormalities. STEP 2 WRIST ARTHROSCOPY VIDEO 1: Verify the diagnosis of ulnar impaction syndrome and treat concurrent intra-articular abnormalities. STEP 3 INCISION FOR THE ULNAR SHORTENING OSTEOTOMY VIDEO 2: Make a longitudinal skin incision along the distal third of the ulna. STEP 4 DESIGN THE STEP-CUT ULNAR SHORTENING OSTEOTOMY VIDEO 2: Design the step-cut ulnar shortening osteotomy. STEP 5 PERFORM THE STEP-CUT ULNAR SHORTENING OSTEOTOMY VIDEO 2: Create the step-cut ulnar shortening osteotomy using an oscillating saw. STEP 6 FIXATION OF THE OSTEOTOMY VIDEO 3: Fix the osteotomy with a lag screw and volar plate. STEP 7 WOUND CLOSURE: Meticulously close the wound in layers. STEP 8 POSTOPERATIVE CARE: Protect the affected arm for the first 6 weeks. RESULTS: In our original study, 164 patients with symptomatic ulnar impaction syndrome were treated with a step-cut ulnar shortening osteotomy using a volar 3.5-mm standard neutralization plate and a lag screw14.

Long-Term Outcome of Step-Cut Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Extra-articular ulnar shortening osteotomy is a common procedure for the surgical treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome. Several techniques for this osteotomy have been developed to avoid the morbidity associated with a standard transverse osteotomy. However, these techniques require special instrumentation and are expensive. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of step-cut ulnar shortening osteotomy without special jigs for ulnar impaction syndrome. METHODS: A retrospective study of 164 consecutive patients who underwent step-cut ulnar shortening osteotomy between 2000 and 2010 was performed. The long arm of the step-cut osteotomy was oriented in the coronal plane parallel to the long axis of the ulna. The short arms of the osteotomy were perpendicular to the long axis in the axial plane. Fixation was performed with a palmar 3.5-mm standard neutralization plate and a lag screw. The goal of the osteotomy was to reduce ulnar variance, which was assessed in all patients with pronated grip-view radiographs preoperatively and postoperatively. Preoperative ulnar variance ranged from +1 to +6 mm. RESULTS: All patients were followed for at least 24 months. Union of the osteotomy site was achieved at a mean of 8.2 weeks. The union rate was 98.8%. There were 2 cases of nonunion, which required additional surgery. The mean postoperative ulnar variance was +0.2 mm (range, -1 to +1.5 mm) after a mean overall ulnar shortening of 2.5 mm. All patients returned to their previous work, in a mean of 4 months. The plate was removed from 12 patients because of plate-related symptoms. No other complications were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: The step-cut ulnar shortening osteotomy provides ample bone-to-bone contact and simplifies control of rotation. Stable internal fixation with standard techniques allowed an early return to functional activities. Palmar placement of the plate diminishes the need for plate removal. This is a simple and less expensive technique for ulnar shortening that does not require the use of special instrumentation in patients with ulnar impaction syndrome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Distal biceps tendon history, updates, and controversies: from the closed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons meeting-2015.

Understanding of the distal biceps anatomy, mechanics, and biology during the last 75 years has greatly improved the physician's ability to advise and to treat patients with ruptured distal tendons. The goal of this paper is to review the past and current advances on complete distal biceps ruptures as well as controversies and future directions that were discussed and debated during the closed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons meeting in 2015.

Release of the stiff elbow with mini-open technique.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are many techniques used in the surgical release of elbow contracture, but no single technique has gained widespread acceptance. The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of a lateral-column approach combined with a mini-open triceps-splitting technique for elbow contracture release. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with a mean age of 39 years were included in the study. All patients underwent a combined lateral and minimal posterior triceps-splitting open elbow contracture release. Elbow range of motion and visual analog scale pain scores were recorded. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score was used to assess functional outcome. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 38 months. Mean pain levels decreased from 7.59 preoperatively to 0.44 postoperatively (P < .05). The total arc of elbow motion increased from 52° preoperatively to 109° postoperatively, with an improvement of 57° (P < .05). The Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved from 44.17 preoperatively to 90.83 postoperatively (P < .05). CONCLUSION: This study shows that a combined lateral and mini-open triceps-splitting approach is a safe and effective alternative technique for the treatment of elbow contractures.

Preliminary results of recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome treated with neurolysis and porcine extracellular matrix nerve wrap.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical results of revision neurolysis and wrapping with porcine extracellular matrix (AxoGuard Nerve Protector, AxoGen Inc., Alachua, FL) for cubital tunnel syndrome after one previous surgical decompression. METHODS: Twelve patients with recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome were treated with decompression, porcine extracellular matrix nerve wrap, and minimal medial epicondylectomy (if not previously performed). The average follow-up period was 41 months (range, 24-61 mo). All patients had recurrent symptoms after having previously undergone one surgical decompression. The mean patient age was 45 years (range, 30-58 y). All patients were evaluated subjectively and objectively (pain, satisfaction, static 2-point discrimination, grip strength, and pinch strength). RESULTS: A significant improvement was demonstrated in postoperative pain levels (from 8.5 to 1.7), grip strength (from 41% to 86% of the unaffected side), and pinch strength (from 64% to 83% of the unaffected side). Static 2-point discrimination improved from an average 10.4 mm preoperatively to 7.6 mm postoperatively. Eleven of 12 patients demonstrated 2 mm or more improvement in 2-point discrimination postoperatively. There were no complications related to the use of the porcine extracellular matrix for nerve wrapping. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that secondary decompression combined with porcine extracellular matrix nerve wrapping was an effective and safe treatment for patients with recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Treatment recommendations for carpal tunnel syndrome and peripheral nerve repair.

Although open and endoscopic techniques for carpal tunnel release can provide excellent results, neither technique has demonstrated clinical superiority. A permanent nerve injury remains the most devastating complication regardless of the technique used. Symptoms in carpal tunnel syndrome recur in up to 30% of patients, usually secondary to scarring of the median nerve. Repeated nerve decompression alone does not always provide satisfactory results in patients with recalcitrant carpal tunnel syndrome. Supplementary techniques with either biologic or synthetic adhesion barriers can be used to cover the nerve, improving functional recovery and preventing recurrent scarring. Direct end-to-end repair without tension remains the gold standard treatment of peripheral nerve lacerations. When primary repair is not possible, biologic or synthetic nerve conduits and nerve allografts are an alternative to autografts. Future advances in bioengineering and better understanding of nerve biology combined with randomized, multicenter, larger studies may lead to the optimal method of peripheral nerve reconstruction.

Human dermal allograft for massive rotator cuff tears.

Previously published studies reported variable results using various suture techniques and reconstruction options for massive rotator cuff tears. Therefore, the current authors retrospectively studied 21 consecutive patients/shoulders with massive rotator cuff tears treated from January 2005 to October 2011 with a human dermal allograft through a mini-open approach. Mean patient age was 58 years (range, 33-72 years). Mean follow-up was 29 months (range, 18-52 months). Ten patients underwent revision repair for a failed rotator cuff repair. The authors measured the tendon gap (mean, 1.7 cm) and acromiohumeral interval (mean, 6.5 mm). They evaluated pain, shoulder range of motion (ROM) and function, patient satisfaction with the operation and outcome, and complications. At last follow-up, all patients experienced significant pain relief (P=.001) and improved ROM (P=.001) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score (P=.001). Eighteen patients reported that they were satisfied or very satisfied and 3 reported that they were not satisfied with the operation and outcome. Comparison of outcomes between patients who underwent primary repair and those who underwent revision repair and between patients who had muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration grades 0 to II and those who had grades III to IV showed no statistically significant differences. A statistically significant correlation was observed between the size of the tendon gap and postoperative pain, ROM (except external rotation), and ASES score (P<.050). No significant correlation was observed between postoperative pain, ROM, and ASES score and the acromiohumeral interval (P>.050). Complications related to the dermal human allograft were not observed.

Chronic Essex-Lopresti injuries: an alternative treatment method.

BACKGROUND: Currently, no technique has met general acceptance for the restoration of forearm longitudinal stability in chronic Essex-Lopresti injuries. The purpose of this study is to present an alternative treatment method for chronic Essex-Lopresti lesions by radial head replacement and ulnar shortening osteotomy. METHODS: Seven patients with a mean age of 42.4 years were included in the study. Five patients had a staged approach, and 2 underwent both procedures simultaneously. The pain level was assessed with the use of a visual analog scale. Elbow, forearm, and wrist range of motion was evaluated. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score and Mayo Wrist Score were used to assess the postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 33 months. The mean pain level was reduced from 8.4 points preoperatively to 3.3 points postoperatively (P < .05). The elbow arc of motion was increased on average from 79° preoperatively to 121° postoperatively (P < .05). Forearm rotation improved from 76° preoperatively to 119° postoperatively (P < .05). The wrist arc of motion improved from 94° preoperatively to 114° postoperatively (P < .05). The mean postoperative Mayo Elbow Performance Score and Mayo Wrist Score were 82 points and 71 points, respectively. The mean ulnar variance was reduced from +8 mm to +3.5 mm postoperatively. CONCLUSION: This study shows that radial head replacement in combination with ulnar shortening osteotomy can be used as an alternative reconstructive procedure in the case of a complex chronic Essex-Lopresti injury. This combination of known procedures yields predictable and satisfactory outcomes and a low complication rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series, treatment study.

Terrible triad injuries of the elbow: does the coronoid always need to be fixed?

BACKGROUND: The "terrible triad" of the elbow is a complex injury that can lead to pain, stiffness, and posttraumatic arthritis if not appropriately treated. The primary goal of surgery for these injuries is to restore stability of the joint sufficient to permit early motion. Although most reports recommend repair and/or replacement of all coronoid and radial head fractures when possible, a recent cadaveric study demonstrated that type II coronoid fractures are stable unless the radial head is removed and not replaced. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were to determine the (1) range of motion; (2) clinical scores using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and the Broberg-Morrey questionnaires; and (3) rate of arthritic changes, heterotopic ossification (HO), or elbow instability postoperatively in patients whose terrible triad injuries of the elbow included Reagan-Morrey type I or II coronoid fractures that were treated without fixation. METHODS: Between April 2008 and December 2010, 14 consecutive patients were treated for acute terrible triad injuries that included two Regan-Morrey type I and 12 Regan-Morrey type II coronoid fractures. Based on the senior author's (DGS) clinical experience that coronoid fractures classified as such do not require fixation to restore intraoperative stability to the posterolaterally dislocated elbow, all injuries were treated by the senior author with a surgical protocol that included radial head repair or prosthetic replacement and repair of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) followed by intraoperative fluoroscopic examination through a range of 20° to 130° of elbow flexion to confirm concentric reduction of the ulnohumeral joint. Using this protocol, intraoperative stability was confirmed in all cases without any attempt at coronoid or anterior capsular repair. Repair of the medial collateral ligament or application of external fixation was not performed in any case. All patients were available for followup at a minimum of 24 months (mean, 41 months; range, 24-56 months). The mean patient age was 52 years (range, 32-58 years). At the followup all patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically by the senior author. Outcome measures included elbow range of motion, forearm rotation, elbow stability, and radiographic evidence of HO or arthritic changes using the Broberg and Morrey scale. Elbow instability was defined as clinical or radiographic evidence of recurrent ulnohumeral dislocation or subluxation at final followup. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the patient-reported DASH questionnaire and the physician-administered Broberg-Morrey elbow rating system. RESULTS: The mean arc of ulnohumeral motion at final followup was 123° (range, 75°-140°) and mean forearm rotation was 145° (range, 70°-170°). The mean Broberg and Morrey score was 90 of 100 (range, 70-100, higher scores reflecting better results) and the average DASH score was 14 of 100 (range, 0-38, higher scores reflecting poorer results). Radiographs revealed mild arthritic changes in one patient. One patient developed radiographically apparent but asymptomatic HO. None of the patients demonstrated instability postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that terrible triad injuries with type I and II coronoid process fractures can be effectively treated without fixation of coronoid fractures when repair or replacement of the radial head fracture and reconstruction of the LUCL complex sufficiently restores intraoperative stability of the elbow through a functional range of motion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Tendon allograft interposition for failed distal ulnar resection: 2- to 14-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the mid- to long-term outcome of distal radioulnar interposition arthroplasty using an Achilles allograft for salvage of painful instability after distal ulnar resection. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with an average age of 43 years were treated with Achilles tendon allograft interposition for failed distal ulnar resection. The average follow-up period was 79 months (range, 25-174 mo). Patients had an average of 2 previous procedures. All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically. At the final follow-up, pain level, satisfaction, forearm rotation, grip strength, and Mayo Modified Wrist Score were assessed. RESULTS: All clinical parameters demonstrated statistically significant improvement at the final follow-up. Mean patient pain scores improved from 8.1 to 1.3, and patient satisfaction scores improved by an average of 6.8 points. Preoperative and postoperative forearm rotation and grip strength measurements improved by an average of 28° in pronation, 41° in supination, and 72% in grip strength. The mean Mayo Modified Wrist Score improved from 42 to 85. Postoperative radiographs showed preservation of an adequate space between the distal radius and the resected distal ulna. No postoperative infections and no foreign body reactions relating to the allograft were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Interposition arthroplasty with an Achilles allograft was an effective salvage procedure for the treatment of failed distal ulnar resection, preventing impingement of the ulnar stump on the radius. This procedure potentially provides a safe and reliable treatment, especially for patients who may not be candidates for implant arthroplasty. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Triceps brachii distal tendon reattachment with a double-row technique.

Case reports and small series have reported variable results regarding the treatment of choice for patients with triceps brachii tendon ruptures. Early surgical repair has been recommended for acute complete ruptures of the triceps brachii distal tendon to prevent late functional disability. However, controversy exists regarding the optimum surgical technique of reattachment. In addition, various attachment techniques have been described, with none shown clinically to be superior. Therefore, the authors present a technique for triceps brachii distal tendon reattachment following acute complete ruptures and evaluate their results in a series of patients.

Human dermal allograft interposition for the reconstruction of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.

This retrospective study sought to determine the effectiveness of the acellular human dermal allograft as a bridging device for reconstruction of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs). Fourteen patients with an average age of 54.6 years underwent open reconstruction for massive irreparable RCTs. Significant improvement was found for pain and range of motion (ROM). Patient satisfaction was high. The mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score improved from 23.8 points preoperatively to 72.3 postoperatively (P = .001). A significant correlation was found between the size of the tendon gap, which was bridged with the allograft, and the pain, ROM and ASES score. Patients with less than 2 cm tendon gap had a better outcome than those with greater tendon defects. Open reconstruction of chronic massive irreparable RCTs with human dermal allograft interposition is an alternative technique with encouraging short-term results. Our study indicates that the dermal allograft can be used safely to bridge tendon gaps of up to 2 cm with great success.